You are here

Eddleston Water, Tweed Catchment


Catchment Information

The Eddleston Water is a tributary of the River Tweed in the Scottish Borders, with a catchment of 70 km2 draining south to join the main river at Peebles. It is typical of rural Scottish catchments of this size, with a mix of forestry, rough grazing and improved grassland, arable and peatland. Currently, SEPA’s flood risk assessment shows some 582 properties at risk of flooding in Eddleston and Peebles under a 1:200 year scenario. The river was classified by SEPA as at ‘bad’ ecological status in 2009 (using EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) criteria, mainly due to historical hydro-morphological alterations to the banks and channel). Water quality is generally good and it is designated an EU Special Area of Conservation (SAC) for its salmon, lampreys, otters and aquatic plants. 

Stage of project

Work in progress

Monitoring Undertaken


Modelling Undertaken


Project Descriptions

The aim of the Eddleston project is to assess the impact of restoring natural features and processes on both flood attenuation and the ecology of the river, and also to provide empirical evidence with which to assess the effectiveness of the measures implemented.

The project, funded by Scottish Government, along with contributions from other public and private sources, and now with additional EU Interreg funding has developed in three phases, summarised below:

2009/10: Scoping study, led by Dundee University which identified a range of potential NFM and habitat restoration measures that theoretically, could be introduced in the catchment; as well as developing a monitoring strategy suitable to assess potential changes.

2010/2011: Installation of a monitoring network by Dundee University comprising: 12 stream gauges, 1 weather station and 4 rain gauges; plus groundwater and fine sediment monitoring (BGS), hydro-morphological and ecological surveys (SEPA, cbec Ltd. and Dundee University)

2012/ongoing:  Implementation and monitoring of NFM measures

In order to achieve results on the ground and be able to implement measures, community engagement and land manager “buy-in” was (and still is) critical. Much of this has been achieved by the Tweed Forum acting as a trusted intermediary, exploring opportunities and reducing the administrative burden on land managers willing to implement NFM measures. 

With the co-operation of many individual farmers, and land managers, the project partners have implemented the following measures on 19 different farm units:

• 142 hectares of newly planted woodland, with 300,000 native trees (including oak, ash, willow, birch, aspen and hazel). Trees increase landscape roughness, increase transpiration, increase infiltration and slow down overland flow. Planting has taken place in headwaters and gullies, on floodplains, (most extensively on the Shiplaw and Longcote Burn but also, bankside at Lake Wood, Shiphorns and Cringletie) and also as transverse hedging (2.5km).

• Created 22 upstream off-line “leaky” ponds (~8155m2) increasing temporary water storage capacity and delaying and flattening the flood peak.  Most of these are in the upper catchment.

• Constructed 101 large woody structures with the purpose of holding back water in high flows and delaying the flood peak by encouraging spillage onto the floodplain and inducing in-channel sediment deposition (i. e. aggradation). These structures have been formed from the most appropriate materials to the individual sites, for example at Middle Burn, nearby conifers were felled and pinned across the channel. Large root wads and trunks were used at the Craigburn drained upland mire site.

• Re-meandered 2.8 km of channel on the main stem of the river, removing flood bank protection and enabling a reconnection between the river channel and the floodplain, in order to slow the flow of water and enable spill over onto the flood plain.

In addition, general good practice is encouraged throughout the catchment for example; the fencing off of water courses to reduce poaching by livestock and additions of fine sediments. SEPA have recently also visited many of the farms to encourage adoption of Best Practice. The water body has gone from bad to moderate status under WFD

Analysis of monitoring data is on-going. Findings so far include:

• Empirical evidence shows that the timing of peak flow at sites with large woody debris structures is substantially delayed when compared to sites without structures. Modelling shows that a reduction in peak water level and delays in predicted travel time of flood peaks occur at flows of 1:5 years and above.

• Measurements of water levels show that ponds in the upper catchment can readily store water, but modelling suggests this will only have a relatively small effect on total sub-catchment runoff at this scale. Initial modelling of the potential impact of a series of larger ponds on the floodplain suggests that, for a 1.5-year return interval flow event, such ponds could theoretically locally reduce the discharge peak.

• There is no clear impact on the timing, or a direct relationship to the magnitude of a flood event following the stream re-meandering. However habitat variability and associated macroinvertebrate species richness have increased in re-meandered sections, and ecological diversity has returned to pre- intervention levels and is expected to exceed this (continued monitoring will determine if this is the case).

•Soils under mature broad leaved woodland have a much higher permeability (5-8 times)) than those under neighbouring grazed pasture. Soils under coniferous forest have a similar permeability to that of the grazed pasture, however processes such as interception and evapotranspiration, and shading effects on snow cover, will contribute to the delay or reduction of flood peaks.


Tweed Forum, SEPA,  University of Dundee,  British Geological Survey, Scottish Borders Council, Scottish Natural Heritage, Scottish Government, Forestry Commission, National Farmers Union (Scotland), Tweed Foundation, Woodland Trust, Forest Carbon, Environment Agency.